THE COMMUNITY NETWORKS DESIGN CENTRE (CNDC)
THE COMMUNITY NETWORKS DESIGN CENTRE (CNDC)
A Telecommunities Canada Project
Project Proposal Draft 2.2 - 29 November 1995
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- 1.0 Abstract
- 2.0 Understanding the knowledge needs of community networks
- 2.1 Clients
- 2.2 Opportunities for partnerships
- 2.3 TC/CNDC's special advantages and strengths
- 2.4 Trends and future directions
- 2.4.1 Growth in community networking
- 2.4.2 Pressure for participation in socio-economic policy
- 2.4.3 Decreasing bandwidth costs
- 2.4.4 Shift to electronic delivery of government services
- 2.4.5 Community control of the "single window" on
government
- 2.4.6 Increased understanding of interactivity
- 2.4.7 Community as the key to balancing local / global
interests
- 3.0 Meeting the knowledge needs of community networks
- 3.1 Goals
- 3.2 Outputs / objectives
- 3.3 Approach and methods
- 3.3.1 Approach
- 3.3.2 Essential project start-up personnel
- 3.3.3 Service components
- 3.3.4 Promotion strategy
- 3.3.5 Revenue and sustainability
- 3.3.6 Project phases
- 3.4 Evaluation process / performance criteria
- 4.0 Budget
- 4.1 Cost factors
- 4.2 Year by year expenditure
- 5.0 Appendices:
- 5.1 What are community networks?
- 5.2 What is Telecommunities Canada?
- 5.2.1 TC strategic principles
- 5.2.2 National issues identified by community networks
1.0 ABSTRACT
At the heart of a Knowledge Society, you will find electronic public
space that is kept open by community networks.
Maturing of the Canadian community networking movement has
generated considerable experience in the use of computer mediated
communications for community development. In addition, many other
Canadian agencies now approach universal access and connectivity in
electronic networks with a "community-centered" focus. The
COMMUNITY NETWORKS DESIGN CENTRE project proposes to tap and
disseminate that expertise by creating a national clearinghouse for
information and research on community networks.
The product of this project is knowledge. Much of the structure of
CNDC can be virtual, and therefore the knowledge can be synthesized,
accessed or disseminated electronically. By creating links among
operational community networks that provide a window on an open
and distributed national knowledge system, CNDC can assist the
growth of new community networks, share operational experience
among existing community networks, and coalesce and inform action
on national issues of community network development.
2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE KNOWLEDGE NEEDS OF COMMUNITY
NETWORKS
When you want to start a community network or community access
site, when you want to solve a community networking problem, who
do you call? Growing interest in community networking increases
demands on the limited voluntary resources of existing community
networks. This proposal outlines a Telecommunities Canada project
to put the people and processes in place that can provide a national
clearinghouse of information to assist community networks to start
and operate.
Operating a community network is very much a matter of balancing
both social and technological systems roles. To date, the social
systems role has been the hardest to explain. But there are real and
huge demands for a continuing focus on technology delivery and the
processes for technology implementation and deployment. Community
networks will undergo sweeping technological changes, with the
model of the last few years fading as the available technology and
bandwidth change the standard. To retain the inventiveness and
strength of purpose that comes from their grassroots autonomy, it is
vital that community networks share a collective means of
influencing those changes.
2.1 CLIENTS
CNDC is a not-for-profit service, meeting national
needs for a focal point to concentrate Canadian community
networking experience. The word "clients" is used in a social service
agency sense, not a commercial sense. But in business case terms,
the potential "market" for CNDC services includes:
- Operational community networks and Free-Nets
- Start-up projects of community networking associations
- Community Access Programme (CAP) sites and projects
(rural / remote)
- Community Information Access Centres (CIACS - urban)
- Social Change Networks: Net-based "communities" of common
interest that operate in the not-for profit or
"non-government organizations sector (for example,
formal coalitions of sectoral, discipline-based, or special
interest networks that use community as an organizational
principle or target community as their point of service.
Other phrases for these include "Public Access
Networks" and "intentional communities"
- Small businesses supplying net-based services with an
interest in balancing small business and not-for-profit
sector common interests in universal access
- Commercial suppliers of community focussed software,
services and connectivity
- Federal, provincial and municipal government agencies with a
focus on development of communications and information
infrastructure
- Federal, provincial and municipal government agencies with
an interest in increasing net-based access to their services
- Libraries
- International clients, especially national programmes for
community networking development
- Individual researchers with an interest in community
networking development
- Other community networking development agencies, Morino
Institute, NPTN, etc.
2.2 OPPORTUNITIES FOR PARTNERSHIPS
In addition to providing
them with services, opportunities exist for establishing formal
working relationships, including collaborative service arrangements,
contracts and shared cost agreements, with client organizations that
have similar interests in the development of community networks,
including:
- Government agencies at all levels with a focus on
development of communications and information
infrastructure for the electronic delivery of government
information and services
- Government agencies at all levels with an interest in
increasing net-based access to their services
- Education and health systems networks
- Commercial suppliers of community focussed software,
services and connectivity
- Other community networking development agencies, Morino
Institute, NPTN, CNet, provincial services, etc.
2.3 TC / CNDC's SPECIAL ADVANTAGES AND STRENGTHS:
- Operating community networks already know imaginative and
practical ways to get things done at the community level. They
increase connectivity and interactivity among community centered
groups and non-government agencies.
- Social sector and community development focus
- Ability to tap existing Canadian operational community networking
expertise
- Ability to express existing Canadian operational community
networking expertise in national regulatory and policy forums on
communications and information infrastructure
- Ability to organize national design projects and events on an
essentially volunteer basis
- Net-based social structures are neither centralized nor
decentralized. Community networks understand how to operate in the
new environment of open and distributed systems.
- Community networks are consciously structuring themselves as
learning organizations that assist average Canadians in experiencing
the Knowledge Society on their own terms. CNDC can easily leverage
already embedded learning systems and "in-place" descriptive data on
how to organize and use community networks into a national shared
knowledge base, without evoking federal-provincial jurisdictional
issues
- Communities evolve approaches to networking that are specific to
their own circumstances. Grassroots infrastructure cannot and will
not become homogeneous. By devolving actual service delivery to
direct points of service within communities, CNDC can counter
"centralizing" approaches to national network development. This
actively supports the emergence of diversity and innovation in
approaches to community network design.
2.4 TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
2.4.1 Growth in community networking
As of May 6, 1995, The 93 listings in the CANADIAN COMMUNITY
NETWORKS DIRECTORY showed that 26 community networks were in
full operation, and an additional 67 were in various stages of
organizing. The 9 operating community networks that provided
membership statistics showed a total membership base of 116,500. It
now seems reasonable to assume there are at least 30 operating
networks with a Canada wide membership of approximately 200,000.
Since these networks are connected to the Internet, it also seems
reasonable to assume membership growth curves similar to Internet
use growth curves, especially as community networks evolve toward
WEB browser based formats for some of their services.
A combination of factors will ensure that the growth of membership
participation rates and benefits continues. Lower cost systems for
home-based access to the Internet are coming into the market. These
can make the technology costs affordable for almost all households.
Many organizations, such as public libraries, business assistance
centers, community centers, and ethnic or cultural organizations
want to act as access points for those they serve who are currently
without personal access. An attitude of self-help characterizes the
spirit of community networking. The early adopters of community
networks are actively passing on their expertise to new participants.
This spirit of mutual assistance on the part of individuals is worth
encouraging.
2.4.2 Pressure for participation in socio-economic policy
The on-going success of community networking depends on the degree
to which there is universal participation in designing the STRUCTURE
of electronic public space. This is more a question of social and
economic policy than of technology policy. Creating a capacity to
voice the concerns of the Canadian community networking movement
provides a powerful and necessary means of increasing direct
participation by all Canadians in socio-economic transformation.
2.4.3 Decreasing bandwidth costs
Changing regulatory approaches and converging technologies will
continue to lower the cost of bandwidth and network connectivity.
But how fast will the rapidly descending costs of providing bandwidth
and connectivity be passed along to consumers? Community networks
need to have a "bits are bits" attitude in their relationships with
regulatory agencies and commercial providers of net connectivity.
Partial approaches to deregulation that protect obsolete technologies
inhibit the growth of the Knowledge Society. Community networks
need the formal means to advocate for "convergence" to occur in a
fully de-regulated market that is NOT limited to particular
technologies of connectivity.
2.4.4 Shift to electronic delivery of government services
There are substantial savings to be realized from the shift to
electronic delivery of government services. Community networks are
essential partners in the process of achieving these savings. The
amount saved within any service or program will vary directly with
the rates of participation in communications and information flows.
The more participants, the more savings. Simple access to multiple
services and information resources provide the attraction that brings
in users. Least cost access will bring the highest participation rates.
Therefore the simple and low cost access provided by community
networks are most likely to generate the highest participation rates
and the most rapid shift to utilization of electronic government
services.
2.4.5 Community control of the "single window" on government
From the individual's point of view, the least personal cost will be
incurred when all electronic government services are accessible
along a simple path using a single set of methods. But the goal of
simplified wide-spread access to government services does not mean
standardized use of any particular government's "single window." No
one government will succeed in providing a single window for
governments overall. Yet the high rates of participation necessary to
create cost savings in the shift to electronic delivery of government
services are less likely to occur unless participants feel that they
have easy access at the desk top level. Community networking is the
best least-cost method of working together to achieve this.
Government networks will themselves benefit from higher usage if
there is a general public acceptance and use of community networks
that include a rich selection of gateways to many types of
government electronic services.
Some governments at the municipal and provincial level are already
contracting with community networks for backbone services. The
models provided through current examples can be generalized to all
levels of government. The resulting partnerships will accelerate the
evolution of a low cost national system of universal access to
electronic delivery of government services. It will also sustain
community-based control of computer mediated communications and
the essential role of community networks in defense of electronic
public space.
2.4.6 Increased understanding of interactivity
Networks as computer mediated communications media are radically
different from broadcast media. Understanding what "participation"
actually means depends on understanding that clients and service
providers "interact." Interactivity causes the presently separated
client / service provider relationship to converge. Good ideas can
come from anywhere. From a social perspective, the most wonderful
aspect of community networks is their ability to encourage voluntary
participation in projects that benefit others.
2.4.7 Community as the key to balancing local / global interests
This project supports the autonomy of community networks as
organizations that are voluntary, grassroots, and based on direct
citizen action in support of the quality of life in community.
The Government of Canada has stated three strategic objectives for
the information highway: jobs, cultural identity and universal access.
Community networks address these objectives head on. And they do
so in a manner that is compatible with the excitement generated by
that prototype of Knowledge Society institutions, the Internet. In
community networks, the volunteers that participate in bringing a
community online are investing their own time in learning new skills
and roles. Community networks intensively collate community
knowledge and experience, leading to a bottom-up global sharing of
Canadian identity on a neighbourhood by neighbourhood basis. And
community networks provide a powerful model of how universal
access to the information highway can actually be used. They don't
create a society of consumers. They do support citizens in sustaining
communities that better meet their needs.
3.0 MEETING THE KNOWLEDGE NEEDS OF COMMUNITY NETWORKS
3.1 GOALS
- To create a CNDC that is in the business of supporting and
sharing the learning that occurs in Canadian communities as
they design, implement and operate community-controlled
computer mediated communications systems.
- To establish CNDC as a national clearinghouse of community
networking information and an operational component of
Telecommunities Canada, thus, strengthening TC's ability to
respond to national issues.
- To understand and express the significance of Canada's
transition to a Knowledge Society in terms of people's
experience by documenting how people and organizations
actually use computer networking technologies in the service
of community on a day to day basis.
3.2 OUTPUTS / OBJECTIVES
- To provide a national clearinghouse system for current information
on community networking services, roles, issues, technologies and
experiences
- To know more things faster - to increase the rate and volume of
learning and knowing about community networking and its
relationship to community development.
- To utilize existing community networks to help other communities
get into the process of community networking
- To encourage and support the development of community networks
in small, isolated or marginalized communities
- To increase network connections and dialogue among national
organizations that provide services within communities, and to
encourage Canadians in the development of electronic ways to
connect, to work cooperatively, and to share electronic resources
among themselves and with the world.
- To encourage Canadian and cooperative international experiments
with methods, alternative technology platforms for community
networks, software improvements, and content standards
- To minimize duplications and overlaps in services, as well as
identify gaps
- To influence the direction of national regulatory and policy change
in favour of community network development
- To share the methods, the means, and the learning that occurs in
community networks by helping local communities to:
- generalize and document their community networking
experience and improve their internal self-learning system
capacities
- negotiate expansions of community-level connectivity
- create and manage on-line groups
- get access
- accelerate the growth of community content
3.3 APPROACH AND METHODS
3.3.1 APPROACH - an overview of operating concepts
The intention is to utilize shared knowledge to lower overall
"national" costs and to move to sustainability by the end of the
project. An essential outcome of the CNDC project is to be perceived
as a pragmatic and legitimate expenditure of public funds on the
community networks development component in the achievement of
the national objective of universal access.
To create a shared knowledge base, CNDC must consciously become a
microcosm and prototype of the systems it serves. Capturing what
we learn as we learn it (ie. explicitly creating feedback of our own
experience) is, in itself, a product. To achieve explicit feedback,
there are essential "functions" that an organization dedicated to the
creation and use of a shared knowledge base must consider. These
include:
- The shared knowledge base itself
- It's "interface" - as a coherent technical basis for a system
of continual learning
- The interactors - in effect, the clients FOR the system and
the creators / users OF the system are the same people. They
"interact" in conversations about purpose and use
- Promoters of the learning environment
- Information resource managers
- Strategic formulation - feedback intelligence (patterns) on
use and issues that re-define purpose
- Social system developers - to foster relationships and defend
rights, when competition over organizational or functional
boundaries threatens to close off the openness that is
essential to learning
CNDC will organize around teams and projects that focus on
increasing knowledge, not functional tasks. We can dynamite the
barriers among functions and jurisdictions by focussing on the
essential outcomes of projects that address common issues. Choices
of activities are a function of mindset. The mindset of community
networking is oriented to open systems, where everybody sees
everybody and everybody knows everything. If we start with a
cooperative approach to ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS, then all
participants in CNDC activities will be committed to achieving the
results of those choices. Flexibility in accommodating broad
participation by others should be used to foster mentoring and to
attract and engage the best and the brightest in community
networking skills and experience.
3.3.2 ESSENTIAL PROJECT START-UP PERSONNEL
The staff team's job is to create, facilitate, and negotiate
participation in projects. Team members must be aware of (trained
in) the performance of each other's tasks. All staff are directly
involved in learning more about community networking, synthesizing
and disseminating that knowledge, advocating for community network
development, and consulting on community network design. Labour
intensive jobs include; content management for the websites that
store the information generated and collected, dissemination
activities, and operational management for an organization based in
part on projects. The staff team includes five positions:
- Research director - anticipate future events
- Management director - executive direction of operations and
external representation
- Knowledge base developer - organize knowledge
as it becomes available
- Knowledge base connector - maintain sites and linkages that
make knowledge accessible
- Administrator - operational control of near-term events
3.3.3 SERVICE COMPONENTS
Specific online content, library and documentation centre services:
- Electronic directory of Canadian community networks and
community access sites, including direct hypertext access to
the descriptive information homepages of operating
community networks
- Directory of specialized expertise
- Production of specialized bibliographies as needed (ie. just-
in-time information rather than just-in-case information)
- Inventory of in-centre collections of:
- Documentation / Research reports / issue discussion
papers / reviews / conference proceedings and/or
links
- inventories of technical solutions and successful
content development approaches
- Current awareness file / anticipation / future scan
file / coming events
- electronic publication, newsletter, reports
- mailserver, newsgroup links
Examples of subject "content":
- evolution of technology platforms for community network
support
- fund raising methods and financially sustainable models for
community network operations
- background on board development and community network
governance
- background on public policy issues surrounding the
development of Canada's communications and information
infrastructure
- acceptable use in community networks and the development
of an electronic common
- gender and computer networking
- the role of computer networks in education, the social
sector and grassroots organizing
- the impact of computer mediated communications on social
networking, including how to work with volunteers and
diverse community groups in this environment
- getting beyond "computer literacy", to the functional set of
intellectual, social and technical skills necessary to create
and use relational thinkspace
- How-to-use manuals, policy manuals, promotional brochures
- Sources of expertise in meeting the needs of those without
home, office or school access to computers
- Reference and referral services
- New community network consulting and project planning services (ie.
dealing with implementation questions and answering specific design
questions on demand)
- National research project coordination / facilitation services
- Dynamic evolution of the "cookbook" (ie. "how-to" guidelines) for
creating new community networks, based directly on operating
network experience
3.3.4 PROMOTION STRATEGY
CNDC must express its message to its clients on three levels. It must
increase awareness of community networking generally. It must be
seen to assist specific communities in understanding how a
community network can be used to achieve their goals. It must
support the central message of community networks overall.
If people remember just one sentence about the purpose of community
networks, that sentence should that be:
-
At the heart of a Knowledge Society, you will find electronic
public space that is kept open by community networks.
The effort required to market this service is considerable. Over the
period of this project, as both individual network connectivity and the
number of operating community networks increase, the necessary mix
of traditional and new media will continue to change rapidly . It will
be important to remain flexible in adapting promotional methods to
the changes. In the initial stages, part of promotional activity will
be aimed at a growing network of community networks, but the
majority of it will have to be oriented to the needs of communities
that have not yet become connected.
Channels for getting out the message include:
- Off-line promotion via traditional media for the uncommitted and
unconnected:
- hands-on demonstrations
- liaison with organizations and institutions
- Community contacts
- Conference / workshop presentations on services, research
projects or issues
- broadcast networks, including active creation of programs
and reactive response to media requests
- publication
- mailings
- Use of computer mediated communications for promotion for the
Net connected and community networks:
- listservers and newsgroups (Network activists will only
recognize expertise in community networking through
consistent and effective participation in online dialogue. The
greater the visibility, the more work this entails)
- Homepage key word structure
- Links to Saskatchewan / CAP / Morino Institute / NPTN /
WELL / sites on community networking
- Intervening in "Information Highway" policy forums
- advanced project development workshops or issues forums
- electronic publication
3.3.5 REVENUE AND SUSTAINABILITY
This proposal anticipates full
funding for the start up period. Opportunities for experimenting with
revenue sources during the first four years include:
- Operational cost recoveries from the design and
implementation of national "gateway" services delivered
through operational community networks.
- Partnerships with industries in development of products and
services
- Research and design project funding
- Component of TC membership revenue
- Charges for extensive reference services and state-of-the
-art reviews
- Publication and subscription revenue from "dissemination"
products
- Charge non-members of primary client groups for access
3.3.6 PROJECT PHASES
Workplan (timetable / project events chart / phases)
- a. project negotiation / approval - six months
- a. project implementation phase - one year
- b. operational phase - two years
- c. evaluation / re-thinking phase - one year
3.4 EVALUATION PROCESS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
(an accountability checklist about how project performance and
progress will be assessed)
- Cost reduction test: within CNDC, and in client operating systems?
- Value added test: did the sharing of knowledge contribute to new
knowledge about the role of community networks in Canada's
transformation into a Knowledge Society?
- Service delivery and productivity test: impact on goals /
objectives?
- Transferability test - how much self-learning / self organizing
capacity built into operating community networks as direct result
of CNDC knowledge sharing activities?
- Grassroots and open systems culture test: is CNDC staff behaviour
consistent with the approach?
- Affordability test: progress to sustainability?
- Electronic public space as commons test: increased citizen
participation in online dialogue on socio-economic and political
issues?
- Single window test: increases in the number of people accessing
electronic government services via community networks?
4.0 BUDGET
5.0 APPENDICES
5.1 WHAT ARE COMMUNITY NETWORKS?
Community networks are known by many names, including Free-Nets(sm),
CivicNets, Community Information Systems, and several others. But they
all share a broad-based focus on serving the communications and
information needs of a local community in a specific geographic location.
Because of Internet connection cost consequences, that location is usually
bounded by the local telephone flat-rate dialing zone. Beyond geography,
community networks encompass the description of needs within the metaphor
of a community "space" in an "electronic commons," whereby non-technical
members can visit the electronic equivalent of a schoolhouse, hospital,
town hall, post office, citizen's forum, etc. They emphasize the role of
the member as citizen of that electronic public space - and encourage
dialogue and interaction among those citizens by offering them equal
access to a common and convenient medium of computer-mediated interactive
communication.
The key differentiation between community networks and the other
types of public access networks lies in the breadth of focus - and the
communication and interaction that takes place around that focus. To
continue the "community space in the electronic commons" metaphor,
the special focus networks could be seen as individual buildings,
organizations or "land uses" - while the community networks
encompass the entire electronic public space and all its services, and
particularly the "town square" or open common areas that give any
online community its unique character.
5.2 WHAT IS TELECOMMUNITIES CANADA?
Telecommunities Canada is the "national voice" for the rapidly developing
Canadian community network movement. In August 1994, over 40 Canadian
community network associations and Free-Nets came together for a
conference in Ottawa. They recommended the formation of a national
association, to support their common interests in the development of the
Canadian community networks movement. They affirmed their interest in
having the means to share the practical experience that they are gaining
of Canada as a Knowledge Society, and to speak to
federal-provincial-municipal interests that affect their development. But
they want that "means" (ie. Telecommunities Canada) to be true to the
grassroots nature of community networking and to be autonomous from
governments.
As a national voice for the needs and concerns of community
networks, Telecommunities Canada is an association of associations.
Ordinary membership in Telecommunities Canada, with full
privileges, is limited to Canadian electronic community network
organizations that:
- operate on a not-for-profit basis;
- have their legal membership open to every citizen of their
community;
- provide equitable access to all citizens in their community;
- encourage exchange, publication and access to the broadest
possible range of information of interest to the community;
- endeavour to create connections with other computer based
networks and to allow the free and interactive flow of
information between different communities; and
- whose membership application has been approved from time
to time by the board of directors.
5.2.1 TC strategic principles
The role of Telecommunities Canada in creating a national strategy for the
development of community networking is based on the following perceptions
and principles:
- Community networks are primary vehicles for Canadians, as private
individuals, to learn about and gain access to networked services.
Community networks are enormously efficient in dealing with public
issues of Canada's transformation into a Knowledge Society.
- The essential element for community network development in
Canada is grassroots community control. Community networks are
not "infrastructure." Community networks are caretakers of
electronic public space created BY the community, not providers of
something FOR the community.
- The responsibility to articulate a long term strategy for Canadian
community network development is inherent in Telecommunities
Canada's mandate. Sustaining the essential autonomy of community
networks requires the means of coordinated collective action among
community networks over issues of national concern.
5.2.2 National issues identified by community networks:
While Telecommunities Canada provides the "national voice", it's the
community networks themselves that actually address those needs. To date,
the needs identified by Canadian community networks that a national voice
would address include:
- Self definition of community nets
- Mentoring (experience sharing)
- Advocacy related to national issues of Community Network
development
- International Relations
- Research and Development (Socio- economic and political
impact, organizational governance, and technology platforms)
- Communications Strategy (Internal and external)
- Francophone Services
- Federal / Provincial / Municipal issues (infrastructure)
PROJECT CONTACTS:
- Project draft by:
- Garth Graham
- Director for Research, TC Board
- aa127@freenet.carleton.ca
- Box 86
- Ashton ON K0A 1B0
- Tel: 613-253-3497
- Project budget by:
- Lisa Donnelly
- Director, TC Board
- am412@freenet.carleton.ca
- 375 Wilbrod Street
- Ottawa ON K1N 6M6
- Tel: 613-241-9554 Fax: 613-241-2477
- President, Telecommunities Canada
- Michael Gillespie
- michaelg@gray.mb.ca
- 708 Oakenwald Avenue
- Winnipeg MB R3T 1M7
- Tel/Fax: 204-943-9000
Return to Telecommunities Canada
Homepage